This is a really good summary of the recent paper that was interpreted as suggesting that the majority of cancer was...

This is a really good summary of the recent paper that was interpreted as suggesting that the majority of cancer was down to luck rather than lifestyle. It didn't really say that at all but showed that there was a correlation between average reproduction rates of stem cells and cancer incidence across tissues, not across populations. Which makes a lot of sense.
http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2015/01/05/cancer-mainly-bad-luck-an-unfortunate-and-distracting-headline/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes : Nature Reviews Cancer

RT @CancerInNorwich: 📢 Join us on Monday at 1pm for the next talk in our virtual seminar series. We will be hearing from Dr Wafa Al-Jamal from @QUBelfast, who will be talking about "Smart Nanomedicimes for Pancreatic Cancer". All are welcome to join via the MS Teams link: https://t.co/4xCYpjGuBZ https://t.co/EGyD4NAgeP

An excellent opportunity to join the cancer genetics team as a diagnostic lab bioinformatician in Norwich. Lots of exciting projects to get involved in. Deadline: 30/05/2023. Happy to chat about this role. https://t.co/SltGsxYF6Y https://t.co/zh08bqZFDb