This is a really well written article about common analytical problems in science.

This is a really well written article about common analytical problems in science. I not sure concious p-hacking occurs as much as the author insists and I would have thought they would have mentioned multiple testing corrections. I really don't like the idea of using a large number of different methodologies and taking the aggregation of them as the result.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes : Nature Reviews Cancer

RT @CancerInNorwich: 📢 Join us on Monday at 1pm for the next talk in our virtual seminar series. We will be hearing from Dr Wafa Al-Jamal from @QUBelfast, who will be talking about "Smart Nanomedicimes for Pancreatic Cancer". All are welcome to join via the MS Teams link: https://t.co/4xCYpjGuBZ https://t.co/EGyD4NAgeP

Universal Scrobbler