This is a really well written article about common analytical problems in science.

This is a really well written article about common analytical problems in science. I not sure concious p-hacking occurs as much as the author insists and I would have thought they would have mentioned multiple testing corrections. I really don't like the idea of using a large number of different methodologies and taking the aggregation of them as the result.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes : Nature Reviews Cancer

RT @jburnmurdoch: Most useful thread I’ve read on the dynamics of Covid transmission. By an expert, and packed full of links to evidence. Indoor spaces and or prolonged face-to-face contact account for large majority of Covid transmission. Walking past someone in street/park much lower risk. https://t.co/fnMrDjAxfq